Rather than detailing the specific tariff changes, I want to focus on practical strategies your company can implement to navigate this volatility. (There are plenty of resources tracking the latest tariff developments, and if your organization is involved in international trade, somebody—or some group of bodies—should already be monitoring these closely.)
Instead, I want to outline some concrete strategies to not only weather tariff uncertainty but potentially gain competitive advantage in this challenging environment. From immediate tactical responses to thoughtful long-term planning, these approaches can help both importers and exporters maintain profitability despite ongoing trade policy disruptions.
Before implementing any strategy, companies should analyze their exposure to tariff changes by looking at both direct exposure (tariffs on company imports) and indirect exposure (tariffs affecting suppliers).
Start by identifying all imported products, calculating current and projected tariff costs, and identifying high-risk items. Document current suppliers, lead times and minimum order quantities. Analyze profit margins before and after tariff increases to prioritize mitigation efforts. Shipping Solutions’ Import Controls Software can help with this.
Let's look at a simple example to illustrate the tariff exposure analysis process. (Please note: the tariff rates used in the examples I've included have likely already changed, so please just use them as examples.)
Company |
Product |
HTS Code |
Country of Origin |
---|---|---|---|
ABC Optics |
Hand magnifiers, magnifying glasses and loupes |
9013.80.2000 |
China |
Metric |
Current Scenario |
New Tariff Scenario |
Annual Import Volume |
50,000 units |
50,000 units |
Unit Cost |
$15.00 |
$15.00 |
Tariff Rate |
6.6% |
31.6% (25% increase) |
Tariff Cost Per Unit |
$0.99 |
$4.74 ($3.75/unit increase) |
Total Landed Cost Per Unit |
$15.99 |
$19.74 |
Retail Selling Price |
$28.00 |
$28.00 |
Gross Margin Per Unit |
$12.01 (43% margin) |
$8.26 (29.5% margin) |
Annual Additional Cost |
|
$187,500 |
This simple analysis helps ABC Optics quantify their exposure ($187,500 annually), understand margin impact (13.4% margin reduction), and set clear targets for mitigation strategies. The company can now make informed decisions about whether to absorb costs, raise prices, renegotiate with suppliers or explore alternative sourcing locations.
Front-loading or pre-buying inventory before tariff implementation can lock in lower costs. Companies like Ford are already building inventory to prepare for anticipated tariff increases. This approach requires careful planning:
While front-loading inventory can protect against tariff increases, companies must carefully consider the potential downsides:
One medical device distributor calculated that front-loading six months of inventory from their Chinese suppliers would save approximately $450,000 in tariffs. However, the additional warehousing costs, capital costs and risk of product updates meant their net benefit was closer to $190,000—still positive, but requiring careful analysis to confirm.
Cost Element | Savings/Cost |
Tariff Savings | +$450,000 |
Additional Warehousing Cost | -$85,000 |
Capital Cost Impact | -$75,000 |
Risk of Product Updates | -$100,000 (estimated value) |
Net Benefit | $190,000 |
The most effective approach often involves selectively front-loading only high-tariff, high-margin, non-perishable products with stable demand forecasts. Companies should develop a scoring system to identify which products make the most sense for this strategy.
Foreign Trade Zones (FTZs) allow companies to store goods without incurring tariffs until they move into domestic markets. This strategy improves cash flow and provides flexibility in timing duty payments. Companies can store inventory in FTZs while monitoring tariff developments, potentially waiting out temporary increases.
It's important to understand how FTZs function during periods of retaliatory tariffs:
A U.S. manufacturer imports steel components from China (subject to Section 301 tariffs) and uses them to produce machinery. By utilizing an FTZ, the company can:
This flexibility is particularly valuable during periods of unpredictable trade relations and shifting tariff landscapes.
As we’re already seeing, when the U.S. implements new tariffs against goods from other countries, those countries often retaliate with new tariffs against U.S. products, which results in higher costs for your foreign customers. To keep their products priced competitively, companies may want to consider more sophisticated pricing approaches:
Rather than raising consumer prices, businesses can use rebates to recover margins while maintaining competitiveness. Several programs can help offset tariff costs:
As much as importers and exporters may hope these changes are a temporary blip in the way we import and export, it’s likely we’re seeing a fundamental shift in the relationships between countries and the way they view the advantages and disadvantages of international trade. Companies need to evaluate their supply chains with the idea of making some fundamental changes to the way they do business:
Many companies in the United States have already reduced their dependence on manufacturers in China and have found new vendors in other Asian economies and Mexico. Companies should follow this trend by developing contingency sourcing options.
Companies should be evaluating and, when possible, reengineering their products to find new sources for parts that may allow their products to qualify under an existing free trade agreement, or modifying their products to qualify for lower-duty HTS codes. This approach has been successfully employed by major companies:
These options require collaboration between product designers, legal teams and logistics professionals to ensure compliance while achieving cost savings. Shipping Solutions Product Classification Software can help identify these opportunities.
While importers and exporters may be focusing much of their attention on the new tariffs and their impact on international trade, enforcement agencies like U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Bureau of Industry and Security, and Directorate of Defense Trade Control are working to ensure compliance with new and existing regulations. Companies should not forget the best practices for trade compliance:
The current tariff volatility represents both challenge and opportunity for U.S. companies engaged in international trade. Organizations that take a proactive, strategic approach can mitigate risks while potentially gaining competitive advantage. To successfully navigate this environment, you need to blend immediate tactical responses and thoughtful long-term planning.
Companies should prioritize comprehensive tariff exposure assessment, implement strategic inventory management, optimize product classifications, diversify supply chains and develop sophisticated pricing strategies. With careful planning and execution, businesses can maintain profitability and competitiveness despite ongoing trade policy uncertainty.
By treating tariff volatility as a multi-year challenge rather than a temporary disruption, forward-thinking companies can position themselves to thrive where competitors merely survive.
Like what you read? Join thousands of exporters and importers and subscribe to the International Trade Blog to get the latest news and tips delivered to your inbox.